Formal appraisals are an integral part of just about any
organization’s performance management process. Dreaded by employees and
managers alike, appraisals are generally touted by human capital management
professionals as key in increasing productivity. There are a wide range of
appraisal solutions out there, which are mostly designed to make managers and
employees hate the process less, and make it a little more likely that the
system will be used according to design.
Ultimately, the primary purpose of the performance appraisal
process is to manage employee performance. So are there other ways to manage
performance?
The key to managing performance is feedback. Feedback can be
handled in any numbers of ways, and doesn't have to be a formal process at all.
In an ideal world, where feedback is a constant occurrence, clearly
communicated and reciprocated, perhaps you could do away with a formal
performance management system, but the reality is that such systems serve more
than one purpose. For one thing, they serve to demonstrate that conversations
concerning performance have occurred, and to document the key points of the
discussion. Should you ever need to terminate an employee for cause, this and
other documentation will prove to be critical in determining whether or not
proper cause exists (hint: it’s pretty rare outside of cases of serious
misconduct) .
In an organization with a very high level of trust between
colleagues, where open and honest communication and feedback is a part of
everyday working life, perhaps a case can be made that formal appraisals aren't
necessary from a feedback perspective, whether they are 360s, online, or
otherwise. However, they will always be necessary for documentation, in the
absence of a world where all employees are good ones, and thus, managers and
employees alike better just resign themselves to the fact that they really
aren't going anywhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment